<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ribeye, medium-cloned?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chefscollaborative.org/2008/01/24/ribeye-medium-cloned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chefscollaborative.org/2008/01/24/ribeye-medium-cloned/</link>
	<description>At Chefs Collaborative, our growing community of chefs, farmers, fishers, educators, and food lovers is dedicated to promoting sustainable cuisine. Join Us!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:24:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Deasy</title>
		<link>http://chefscollaborative.org/2008/01/24/ribeye-medium-cloned/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Deasy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chefscollaborative.org/2008/01/24/ribeye-medium-cloned/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>I have serious doubts about the FDA&#039;s assurances of the safety of food from cloned animals.  After all, the USDA strictly bans the use of cloned animals and their offspring from the production of organic food, which seems to indicate doubts at that agency.

The Center for Food Safety, a non-profit public interest organization, has stated, “Given the lack of data regarding human health impacts, CFS believes the FDA was premature in pronouncing food from cloned animals to be safe to eat.&quot;

According to the Cornucopia Institute, a nonprofit farm policy research group, the realities of cloning include some disturbing phenomena:

• 64% of cattle, 40% of sheep, and 93% of cloned mice exhibit some form of abnormality, with a large percentage of the animals dying during gestation or shortly after birth
 
• High rates of late abortion and early prenatal death, with failure rates of 95% to 97% in most mammal cloning attempts

• Defects such as grossly oversized calves, enlarged tongues, squashed faces, intestinal blockages, immune deficiencies, and diabetes

• When cloning does not produce a normal animal, many of the difficult pregnancies cause physical suffering or death to the surrogate mothers

Mark Kastel of the Cornucopia Institute says:

Regardless of what the proponents claim this is all about bottom-line profit and producing more and more of our food from giant industrial-scale farming operations. We are getting so, so far away from farmer Jones and the intimate connection between the land, animals, and the people who care for them in a sustainable and regenerative system. I wish I could say this was science fiction.

An article in the Washington Post by Rick Weiss offers the following troublesome news:

&quot;Executives from the nation&#039;s major cattle cloning companies conceded...that they have not been able to keep track of how many offspring of clones have entered the food supply, despite a years-old request by the FDA to keep them off the market.&quot;

One Kansas cattle producer has disclosed that he has openly sold semen from prize-winning clones to many U.S. meat producers in the past few years, and that he is certain he is not alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have serious doubts about the FDA&#8217;s assurances of the safety of food from cloned animals.  After all, the USDA strictly bans the use of cloned animals and their offspring from the production of organic food, which seems to indicate doubts at that agency.</p>
<p>The Center for Food Safety, a non-profit public interest organization, has stated, “Given the lack of data regarding human health impacts, CFS believes the FDA was premature in pronouncing food from cloned animals to be safe to eat.&#8221;</p>
<p>According to the Cornucopia Institute, a nonprofit farm policy research group, the realities of cloning include some disturbing phenomena:</p>
<p>• 64% of cattle, 40% of sheep, and 93% of cloned mice exhibit some form of abnormality, with a large percentage of the animals dying during gestation or shortly after birth</p>
<p>• High rates of late abortion and early prenatal death, with failure rates of 95% to 97% in most mammal cloning attempts</p>
<p>• Defects such as grossly oversized calves, enlarged tongues, squashed faces, intestinal blockages, immune deficiencies, and diabetes</p>
<p>• When cloning does not produce a normal animal, many of the difficult pregnancies cause physical suffering or death to the surrogate mothers</p>
<p>Mark Kastel of the Cornucopia Institute says:</p>
<p>Regardless of what the proponents claim this is all about bottom-line profit and producing more and more of our food from giant industrial-scale farming operations. We are getting so, so far away from farmer Jones and the intimate connection between the land, animals, and the people who care for them in a sustainable and regenerative system. I wish I could say this was science fiction.</p>
<p>An article in the Washington Post by Rick Weiss offers the following troublesome news:</p>
<p>&#8220;Executives from the nation&#8217;s major cattle cloning companies conceded&#8230;that they have not been able to keep track of how many offspring of clones have entered the food supply, despite a years-old request by the FDA to keep them off the market.&#8221;</p>
<p>One Kansas cattle producer has disclosed that he has openly sold semen from prize-winning clones to many U.S. meat producers in the past few years, and that he is certain he is not alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
