The FDA declared on January 15 that cloned animals were safe to eat. After studying the chemical makeup of beef, pork and milk from clones, FDA scientists determined that they didn’t differ from food already for sale in the US. Cloned meat and milk are “as safe as food we eat every day,” says the FDA. The agency also ruled that the identification of cloned food would not be necessary, which prompted Representative Rosa DeLauro (D-Connecticut) to introduce legislation requiring labeling on cloned products.
Chefs around the country wondered why cloning was necessary, although to read the FDA report, it appears to be a cost- and labor-saving device. Cloned cow offspring, for example, can be designed to produce vast quantities of milk without the time and attention spent in traditional agriculture.
“In the kitchen, that’s what we call cutting corners,” said Daniel Bojorquez, chef de cuisine of Sel de la Terre in Natick, Massachusetts. “There are long-term consequences,” said Bojorquez, reflecting on how pure-bred animals often exhibit erratic behavior and vulnerabilities to disease. “I don’t know why they don’t just do it the natural way.” Vitaly Paley of Paley’s Place in Portland, Oregon also expressed serious doubt. He felt that labeling was imperative, so that customers could make a clear decision about what they were eating.
Aidan Davin of Stillman’s Farm in Hardwick, Massachusetts, echoed Bojorquez’s concerns. He had just delivered pigs to Sel de la Terre the day before we spoke. “I don’t know about the whole idea. Pigs reproduce pretty easily. I just let them do what they do. They’re more than happy to!”
Davin remembered the big hog breeders he knew, mostly in the South, who kept the hogs enclosed because they were not disease-resistant. “There’s no hybrid vigor,” he explained. “It’s a weaker strain in the end. If you introduce different blood lines, you get a better animal.” Paley wondered what would happen when cloned animals “intermingled” with regular animals. To some farmers, it seems that cloning might take that pure-bred vulnerability one step further, even while disease resistance appears be a reason for cloning in the first place.
Annie Cuggino of Veritable Quandary in Portland, Oregon wanted the government to help small farmers, whose competitive edge might be hurt by the FDA decision. Cuggino also acknowledged the current strong consumer awareness about food. Customers practically interrogate her about the specific origins of what Veritable Quandary serves, as do those at Paley’s Place. “People are really sophisticated about food’s origins now,” she said, admitting that the FDA report seemed out of step with the active farm-to-table movement.
Industrial farming is powerful, she acknowledges, “but something positive must be happening, because if Costco and Burgerville are including local and seasonal items, that tells you something.”
In light of the FDA’s decision, and a voluntary ban on clones in the food supply that the USDA requested farmers to continue, the relationship of trust between farmers, restaurants and consumers is of vital importance.
The chefs and farmers I spoke to agreed that the risks of cloning were potentially devastating, and the benefit unclear. Said Cuggino: “I wish that we would keep our eye on the ball, promote the farmers’ markets, help the small farmers to be competitive, and help the farmers do it right. Given the choice, I hope that people will choose a [sustainable] alternative,” even if it costs more. “That’s where our voice is, how we spend our money. Where we put our money speaks volumes, and that’s empowering.”
Posted by: Rebecca Ruquist
